Okay, let's discard RDA from my notion, and concentrate on the other half of my notion.RRM wrote:So, your hypothesis is based on something crappy that you do not need.Aytundra wrote:I do not need JSNFS RDA values to create the blue, green and red hypotheses.RRM wrote:Please explain.Aytundra wrote:The blue, green, red hypotheses, are based on not meeting RDA proportions of KMgCa (KMgCaLog Ca@600mg graph).RRM wrote:This notion is based on what?Aytundra wrote:If blue is above red, and green is above red, then cramps.
...RDA values, I think of them as a crappy benchmark
Let's pretend the world has no knowledge of RDA or RDI values.
We have to come up with our own K:Mg:Ca proportions.
Let's look at whole foods and their K:Mg:Ca proportions in whole foods.
And determine the K:Mg:Ca ratio that a human needs.
The blue, green, red hypotheses, are based on meeting whole life form proportions.
Sugar, olive oil, and canned olives, plus milk and yolk, will have to be omitted from analysis because they are not "whole organisms".(RRM, Don't freak out, I don't mean to eliminate them from the diet, just for theoretical thought analysis, to determine what proportions of K:Ca:Mg that we need.)
Aside: Hmm, I am now interested in the notions of how FDA and JSFNS concluded their RDA and RDI values.