I'm trying to help people I know eat better. People are usually shocked when I advise them to not eat grains. I'm convinced that grains cause health problems.
When it comes to vegetables, I know wai doesn't include them. I am also convinced that they are not necessary for adequate nutrition. Some people I advise want to eat them for variety or because they like them.
I'm trying to help people take steps to get a better diet. I guess I'm trying to decide if vegetables are bad for our health or simply not necessary.
are vegetables best removed from diet or just not necessary
-
johndela1
- Posts: 968
- https://cutt.ly/meble-kuchenne-wroclaw
- Joined: Fri 31 Mar 2006 03:54
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
Of all bad foods, maybe vegetables are the least bad, because they contain no oxysterols, trans fats, and little bad proteins.
However, they are still bad: http://www.youngerthanyourage.com/13/plants.htm
But, when it comes to people not wanting to do the diet 100%, vegetables are the best munch foods, for variety, for example.
However, they are still bad: http://www.youngerthanyourage.com/13/plants.htm
But, when it comes to people not wanting to do the diet 100%, vegetables are the best munch foods, for variety, for example.
From what I've read I think vegetable are hard to digest and give you a big of a tummy because they require intestinal gas release?
Not sure bu I think that's why. But I also think if you juice them that might get rid of the problem.
Same thing with cooking; makes them easier to digest but then you have the side effects of cooking.
Not sure bu I think that's why. But I also think if you juice them that might get rid of the problem.
Same thing with cooking; makes them easier to digest but then you have the side effects of cooking.